Urgent Warning
Llano
Property Owners
LlanoWatch.org
eternal vigilance is the cost of liberty
Thomas Jefferson
Llano Citizens'
Bill of Rights


Skip Navigation Links.

Did you know that the Llano City Council is considering adding radioactive water to our drinking water?

The City of Llano has hired Hejl, Lee and Associates to look into bringing water in from Valley Springs as a supplement to our water supply.  The water in Valley Springs is fed by the Hickory Aquifer, which is known to be contaminated with radium virtually everywhere in Llano County.

Radium is a million times more radioactive than uranium.  It is believed to have killed Marie Curie, the person who discovered it.  (Her own research notebooks are still too radioactive to safely handle today.)

There is absolutely no health benefit to ingesting radium.  Rather, it only causes harm.  As radium decays into radon it shoots out particles at a speed of 33 million miles an hour.  Yes, they are very small particles, but most anything traveling that fast will cause damage to soft tissue inside the body.

To make matters worse, radium doesn't just flush through you when you drink it.  It is chemically similar to calcium so about 20% of what you drink eventually gets laid into your bones.  If you cook with radium contaminated water and breathe in the steam, say from spaghetti or rice, a lot more of it is deposited in your system than if you were unlucky enough to drink it in.

And once it's in your bones it stays there, where from time to time it decays and shoots out those particles at 33 million miles an hour.

The legal maximum contaminant level (MCL) of radium in drinking water was set in 1976.  It was based on the deaths of several young women in the 1920s who used to paint radium onto watch and clock dials.  Radium is the original glow in the dark substance, but it's now considered too dangerous for watches and clocks.

The goal for radium contamination in water was also set in 1976.  That number is zero.

There is a lot to know about the health effects of radium.  And it turns out there is at least one study on what radium will do to a baby starting off in the mother's womb.  In an article published in 1993 (so the legal MCL set in 1976 doesn't account for it) radium is implicated in a significant increase of childhood leukemia - it being first absorbed in the placenta.  

It's easy to verify, do a Google search of: radium childhood leukemia.  Or for more results try just: radium incidence;  "incidence" seems to be a popular word in medical articles on cancer.

Mike Hazel, Jeanne Puryear, Dustin McLeod, Sherry Simpson, and Kelli Tudyk will decide whether to pipe the Hickory water in.  They will be deciding our future and the future of Llano's unborn children.

With this in mind I have contacted every one of them to ask their opinions on deliberately bringing this radioactive contaminant into our drinking water.  They all said much the same thing:  They're waiting for someone else to inform them on what to think.

This letter is to inform them, and you on the subject.  The people of Llano should know this decision is being made, and be aware of what City Council might do.  There is nothing good to be had from drinking radium.

 

HICKORY AQUIFER & RADIUM - DETAILS & REFERENCES

All indications are that there is radium in the Hickory aquifer.  The following is a starting point, an accumulation of research on radium, where it comes from in the aquifer, its accepted concentration for consumption, what the actual concentration is, health effects, means of purifying, and so on.

 

What kind of Radium is in the water?  It occurs naturally in four different forms: 223, 224, 226 and 228  It looks like the Hickory has all four types.  Radium 223 and radium 224 occur in "minute quantities".

95% removal of one type achieves 95% removal of the other.  In other words one treatment process works equally well for removing all types.

See: Texas A&M University Study  

 

Is there also uranium in the water?  It seems uranium and thorium are in the surrounding rocks, but not the water.  The decay process goes from uranium to thorium to radium to radon.  The uranium and thorium are the natural cause for radium in the aquifer.

See:  Hickory Aquifer as a Public Water Supply Study  and  Argonne National Laboratory Paper - Natural Decay Series: Uranium, Radium, and Thorium

See page 5 of the first link above for other wells in the vicinity with radiological geochemistry.

 

How radioactive is the Llano river to start with?  City documentation shows "Beta/Photon emitters" at a level of 4.7 mrem/yr in the river water.  The legal maximum contaminant level (for consumption) is 50 mrem/yr.  Llano river water is at appx. 10% the legal limit.

Upstream sources of radium (and perhaps other radionuclides) in the Llano may have been added since the above report was generated.   (For example, does fracking in the aquifer feeding the Llano introduce radium?  How much radium are Junction and Mason adding to the Llano from their wells?). The addition of upstream sources of radium would increase the amount of river water required to blend Hickory water down to legal levels.

 

How much radium is allowed?  EPA bases current water quality standards on someone drinking two liters of water per day for a lifetime (70 years):

The maximum contaminant level (MCL) for total radium (combined radium 226 and radium 228) in water is 5 picocuries per liter

Drinking water with a level of 5 pCi/L for a year is "about the same as one chest x-ray" per year. It is also about the same as cosmic radiation received during about five flights from Maryland to California.  MCL is an important term: maximum contaminant level.

See:  Palm Beach County Cancer Cluster Fact Sheet

It should be noted that one extra chest x-ray per year is not necessarily comparable to radium deposited in the bone structure which then regularly emits radiation into the body throughout a year.  Nor is it comparable to an inhaled steamy mist. How much radium is in the water from the Hickory?  In Brady, which gets water from the Hickory, the contaminant level is 14.3 pCi/L.  Almost 3 times the maximum level shown above.   Another report puts the average rate across the aquifer at "about 37 picocuries per liter".  More than 7 times the MCL.

See:  Brady TCEQ Mandated Contamination Notice and San Angelo Water fact Sheet

Here it should be noted that 37 picocuries is an average; meaning that in some places the level is much higher, and in others much lower.

 

How is radium tested for and how accurate is the test?  Testing methods have not yet been investigated.  There is a dispute as to the accuracy of tests, with State of Texas methods possibly underreporting the concentration.

See:  Alternate method for Ra Determination in Water

 

How does radium cause damage?  Internally deposited radium (for example, radium deposited on bone) emits alpha particles that may then damage surrounding tissue. Studies of workers exposed to high levels of radium and other sources of alpha radiation for extended periods show that high levels of radium may cause depression of the immune system, anemia, cataracts, and fractured teeth. Exposure to high levels of radium also has shown an increased incidence of bone, liver and breast cancer.

See:  Illinois Department of Health Radium in Drinking Water fact Sheet  and  EPA on What does radium do once it gets into the body?  

Also:  Radium emits several different kinds of radiation, in particular, alpha particles and gamma rays. Alpha particles are generally only harmful if emitted inside the body. However, both internal and external exposure to gamma radiation is harmful. Gamma rays can penetrate the body, so gamma emitters like radium can result in exposures even when the source is a distance away.

Long-term exposure to radium increases the risk of developing several diseases. Inhaled or ingested radium increases the risk of developing such diseases as lymphoma, bone cancer, and diseases that affect the formation of blood, such as leukemia and aplastic anemia. These effects usually take years to develop. External exposure to radium's gamma radiation increases the risk of cancer to varying degrees in all tissues and organs.

See:  EPA on Health Effects of Radium

 

What kind of removal/purification methods are there to lessen the concentration?

Reverse osmosis

Ion exchange water softening

Impregnated fiber or granular media absorption

Impregnated resin absorption (WRT Z-88)

Potassium permanganate greensand filtration

The above are among others, yet to be included.  Treatment methods remove from 50% to 99% of radium, and range in costs.  Ion exchange, lime softening, and reverse osmosis are the most common and can remove up to 90 percent of radium present. Ion exchange (i.e. water softeners) can often remove 90 percent of radium present along with water hardness. For some people, an undesired effect of ion exchange is the addition of sodium to the treated water. Those on low sodium (salt) diets should consider this before installing a softener.

See: Univ of Houston Presentation on Removal of Radium from Drinking Water Supplieds  and   Illinois Department of Health Radium in Drinking Water fact Sheet

Also:  Several treatment technologies effectively remove radionuclides from water. Radium and gross alpha particle activity are the two radionuclide contaminants that are of concern in the Hickory aquifer wells. Gross alpha particle activity is an indirect measure for radionuclides, measuring the alpha radiation generated by source contaminants. EPA recommends cation exchange (CAX), reverse osmosis (RO), and specialty media as effective technologies for radium removal for small communities. For removal of gross alpha particle activity, the recommended EPA best available technology is limited to RO. However, one EPA expert has stated that if radium is the generator of the gross alpha particle activity, then effective radium removal will also reduce the gross alpha particle activity.  For well sources where gross alpha particle activity exceeds the MCL, pilot tests would have to be conducted to assess the effectiveness of treatment processes other than RO.

See: Texas Regional Water Planning Group: Region F Water Plan: Water Management Strategies

 

What else may be in the Hickory aquifer:  Water from the aquifer is generally fresh, but contains naturally-occurring radionuclides and consistently exceeds the MCLs for Radium-226, Radium-228 and or gross alpha radiation; this water may contain high levels of radon gas. It has also been found that Hickory water may contain iron concentrations exceeding drinking water standards. Treatment options to remove these contaminants are expensive, especially with the disposal of the hazardous waste solids.

In general, the quality of water from the Hickory aquifer could be described as moderate to low quality. The total dissolved solids concentrations vary from 300 to 500 mg/l. In some areas the groundwater may have dissolved solids concentrations as high as 3,000 mg/l. The water may contain alpha particle and total radium concentrations that may exceed the new safe drinking water levels soon to be issued by the EPA. Radon gas may also be entrained. Most of the radioactive groundwater is thought to be produced from the middle Hickory unit, while the upper Hickory unit produces water that exceeds safe drinking water concentrations for iron. High nitrate levels may be found in the shallower portions of the aquifer where there may be interaction with surface activities such as fertilizer applications and septic systems.

See:  Burnet-Llano County Regional Water Facility Study  and  Texas Region K Water Plan Water Sources

 

Also: The U.S. EPA has set the MCL of gross alpha radiation in drinking water at 15 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). Most of the groundwater in Texas with gross alpha radiation greater than the MCL is found in the Hickory Aquifer in Central Texas.

See:  Texas Groundwater Protection Committee Study on Radionuclides in Texas Drinking Water

 

How to dispose of residue?  That is, how do we get rid of the radioactive water and filters left behind after processing?  Options include discharge to a Publicly Owned Treatment Works, discharge into a water body, discharge into an injection well, ship out of state.

See:  Texas Natural resource Conservation Commission Paper on Implementing National Drinking Water Regulations for Radiomuclides

The above document has some very pertinent information.  Costs per customer bill are included in the above document.

 

Potential upfront costs to purify radium out of water: Upper Deerfield Township in Cumberland County, NJ installed a radium treatment facility for about $1.6 million in 2010. Pop. approx. 7600.

See:  Hammonton plans $2.1 million bond to build plant to filter radium from drinking water

 

Goodview, MN pop. approx. 4000 spent over $3,500,00 on their treatment.

See:  Small City Tackles Radium in Well Water

 

Brady is looking at spending $500,000 to treat the radioactive water from the Hickory.

See:  Brady Loan for $500,000 Funding for Radium Removal Facility

 

A very in-depth report for Mason's options.

See:  University of Texas Feasibility Study on Mason Water Supply

 

What about just blending with water from the Llano?  If blending alone were used, an off the cuff look says it would take from 3 to 8 gallons of Llano river water per gallon of Hickory water.  Is this a reasonable increase to our water supply given the costs?

 

Miscellaneous:  On Nov. 8, 2012 the City of Mason had posted a warning on their web site advising citizens of radium contamination beyond the MCL in City water.  Another advisory on gross alpha beyond the MCL was linked to but could not be followed.

See:  TCEQ Drinking Water Combined Radium Violation for Mason

See:  TCEQ Notice of Drinking Water Gross Alpha Particle Violation for Mason

THOUGHTS and OTHER INFORMATION

That might not seem so bad, an extra chest x-ray every year.  But if you want to live to be 80 do you want 80 extra chest x-rays?  And the problem is, we do fly.  We use cell phones, we have radio and TV radiation.  We have radiation from the sun.  We have normal background radiation from the Earth.  We have radiation from radon gas, and airport scanners, and police radar, and microwave tower transmissions and microwaves in our homes.  Computers, laptops, monitors...  And so on.

Everyone says their contribution is so small that it hardly makes a difference.  A drop in the bucket. How many drops of radiation can you take?  What are the cumulative long term effects of this many different sources of low level radiation, including drinking radium in our water?

And how accurate is the assessment of safe levels of radium anyway?  The consequences for children would be greater given the amount of bone they create as they grow.  Also the elderly suffering bone loss may be disproportionately affected.

Will it help Llano's image to be pumping in and treating radioactive water, and then possibly dumping radioactive residue into the river?

With the evidence that radium is deposited in bone structure, what elderly couple will want to retire here?  Who would want to have a baby here ?

 

Radium is a million times more radioactive than uranium.

See:  Radium in Wikipedia

 

Pipes themselves may become radioactive after time.  How to dispose of them? 

See:  KHOU Houston: Texas drinking water makes pipes and plumbing radiioactive

One report says radium does not adhere to concrete, copper, or PVC, but rust on the inside of cast-iron will absorb "small amounts".  The same report says San Angelo can expect the aquifer to last 50 or so years.  Is the cost of the line worth it?

See:  San Angelo $120 million project to develop the Hickory Aquifer ( scroll down to second section)

In a time of drought will there be enough water in the Llano to blend down the radium levels of water from the Hickory Aquifer?  At that same blending rate will there be enough water from the Hickory to blend down the native contaminants in the Llano? 

Also, if the Llano stops flowing can the radioactive residue from reverse osmosis still be discharged?

In a long hot summer, is the 2 liter standard what people will limit themselves to?  The irony of radium laced water being brought in for people to drink in hot dry weather.

 

Radium MCL standard set in 1976.

See: EPA Radionuclides Rule

 

Uranium standard set based on cost to remove:

See: EPA Old Rule

  

The seminal TCEQ document.  The following has pertinent information on costs, etc.  a very relevant source.  Apparently only released after a PIA request and appeal to the Attorney General. Closer reading should answer questions on costs of filtration and disposal of residue: 

40 CFR 141 Implementing the National Primary Drinking Water regulations for Radionuclides

 or Another link to the same file

Further reading:

- Texas A&M article: Drinking Water problems: Radionuclides

- KHOU Houston Exposé: Texas Politicians knew agency hid the amount of radiation in drinking water

- Texas Region F Legislative Recommendations

Above suggests not even enforcing EPA standard.

 - The EPA guideline itself 

- EPA testing guideline summary

- Mayo Clinic suggests 2.2 liters of fluids per day for women, and 3 for men.  Breast feeding women, laborers, and people in hot dry climates should drink more. 

- 1992 study on increase in cancer rates from radium in water

 


 

Based on extrapolation of risk from the highly exposed radium dial painters and medically treated cohorts, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) estimates that the lifetime cancer mortality risk (predominantly due to bone cancer) at the MCL for combined radium is 0.7 per 10,000 to 2.0 per 10,000, depending on the relative proportion of radium-226 and radium- 228. The USEPA (2000) has concluded that there is reasonable evidence that radioactivity acts linearly with dose down to zero. However, there has been considerable discussion of whether the cancer potency estimates of the radium isotopes can be applied to the much lower levels of exposure through drinking water supplies.

See: Radium in Drinking Water and the Incidence of Osteosarcoma

 


  

Background: Radiological pollution is a potentially important aspect of water quality. However, relatively few studies have been conducted to document its possible health effects.

 

Objective: In this commentary we discuss available epidemiological findings and related data from experimental studies concerning the health effects of naturally radioactive water ingestion.

 

Discussion: Despite modest epidemiological evidence of uranium nephrotoxicity and radium effects on bone, available data are not sufficient to quantify the health effects of naturally occurring radionuclides in water. Methodological limitations (exposure measurement methods, control for confounding, sample size) affect most studies. Power calculations should be conducted before launching new epidemiological studies focusing on late pathological outcomes. Studies based on biomarkers of exposure and adverse effects may be helpful but should involve more specific molecules than biomarkers used in previous studies. Experimental data on ingestion of drinking water are limited to uranium studies, and there is some disagreement between these studies about the nephrotoxicity threshold.

 

Conclusion: Further experimental and enhanced epidemiological studies should help to reduce uncertainties resulting from dose estimation to doseresponse characterization.

See:  NIH Research: Health Effects of Naturally Radioactive Water Ingestion

 

Radium implicated in childhood leukemia due to prenatal exposure:  Only sparse measurements of 226Ra are available, but derived red bone marrow doses for children in the two villages obtained from a simple radio-ecological model show the significance of the drinking water pathway. Prenatal 226Ra exposure of fetuses due to placental transfer and accumulation may have led to significant doses and may explain the excess cases of childhood leukemia in the region even in quantitative terms.

See:   NIH Research: Radium-226-contaminated drinking water: hypothesis on an exposure pathway in a population with elevated childhood leukemia

 

Alpha particles, like helium nuclei, have a net spin of zero. Due to the mechanism of their production in classical alpha radioactive decay, alpha particles classically have a kinetic energy of about 5 MeV, and a velocity in the vicinity of 5% the speed of light (see discussion below for the limits of these figures in alpha decay). They are a highly ionizing form of particle radiation, and (when resulting from radioactive alpha decay) have low penetration depth.

See:  Alpha Particle

The speed of light is 671 million miles an hour.  5% of this is 134 million miles an hour.

 

 

CHECK IT: Environmental fact Sheet from NH Dept. of Environmental Services

 

 

BACK




This site contains the individual opinions of the members of Llano Watch. Please report any errors and they will be fixed immediately.